+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 75

Thread: Tivo and E*. Talk about patent laws and the court system

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    7,149
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ergan's Toupe View Post
    I agree Charlie would be crazy to let it get that far, but did anyone think it would get this far?

    Charlie was found to infringe twice and was also found to be in Contempt of Court. Does this sound like a guy who is suddenly going to give up and settle?

    If the boxes go dark there is only one person to blame.
    This is typical charlie though. Take it as far as you can, but he knows, that without DVRs, the company is toast.
    Settle will be a last resort, but it would happen before DVRs are cut off, IMO.

  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skyhi View Post
    I admit I havn't followed this case at all, but if the VIPs are colorably different, E* should be in the clear, right?

    I think you're probably understating things a bit when you say a simple legal motion.....E* would certainly respond to the motion....
    Yes, If they are more than colorably different there is no contempt. Only problem is that the VIP's use the same software that was just found to infringe (again).

    Yes, of course E* would be able to respond. My point is there will be no Jury, and most importantly, no 5 year delay. All Tivo will have to do is file a contempt motion with the same judge that just found E* to infringe for a second time and also found E* in contempt.

    I don't know about you but I don't think Charlie is going to like the outcome if TIVO files a contempt motion on the VIP's.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by msmith198025 View Post
    This is typical charlie though. Take it as far as you can, but he knows, that without DVRs, the company is toast.
    Settle will be a last resort, but it would happen before DVRs are cut off, IMO.
    Yea, like I say, Charlie would be crazy and be committing business suicide, but never say never, Charlie is a "stubborn" man. :)

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    2,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ergan's Toupe View Post
    I agree Charlie would be crazy to let it get that far, but did anyone think it would get this far?

    Charlie was found to infringe twice and was also found to be in Contempt of Court. Does this sound like a guy who is suddenly going to give up and settle?

    If the boxes go dark there is only one person to blame.
    It doesn't surprise me that it got this far......

    He'll give up and settle if it means staying in business....

    I don't care either way about Charlie.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    7,149
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ergan's Toupe View Post
    Yes, If they are more than colorably different there is no contempt. Only problem is that the VIP's use the same software that was just found to infringe (again).
    Then why have they not gone after them already? Honest question, I have not been following it that much myself

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    7,149
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    By the way, welcome to the new members

    Hope you take the time to get involved with the other discussions as well

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skyhi View Post
    It doesn't surprise me that it got this far......

    He'll give up and settle if it means staying in business....
    I'm not yelling fire so don't take it that way but it takes two to "settle". Who's to say TIVO even wants to settle? What if after over 5 years of Charlie's BS TIVO doesn't want to deal with Charlie? What if they just want the damages owed and the boxes shut off?

    Quote Originally Posted by Skyhi View Post
    I don't care either way about Charlie.
    Neither do I but I will admit I always get a kick out of watching a bully take a beating. Charlie could have settled for a $1.50 a box a couple of years ago but decided to do what he does best, go to court and get pounded.

    Oh, and does anyone else find it ironic that a guy who constantly whines about "pirating" was found guilty of "infringement" twice?

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by msmith198025 View Post
    Then why have they not gone after them already? Honest question, I have not been following it that much myself
    I would be lying if I gave you an answer to that question. Bottom line is I don't know.

    If I would have to guess I would say that TIVO is going to wait until after the damages hearing in front of Judge Folsom next month. They probably don't want to start anything new until they close the book and the 8 named models.

    Same reason TIVO hasn't gone after any of the other MSO's that they think are infringing. IMO.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    7,149
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ergan's Toupe View Post
    I'm not yelling fire so don't take it that way but it takes two to "settle". Who's to say TIVO even wants to settle? What if after over 5 years of Charlie's BS TIVO doesn't want to deal with Charlie? What if they just want the damages owed and the boxes shut off?


    Good point

  10. Default

    Looks like the Sat Guys thread is toast.

    http://www.satelliteguys.us/dish-net...-vs-e-124.html

    It amazes me that every thread on every board a certain "internet lawyer" goes gets shut down. :confused:

    Talk about throwing the baby out with the bath water.... :eek:

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    7,149
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    They simply wanted to keep the political talk and personal insults out of it. I agree with their decision.

    We do not mind the politics of it, the main reason we are here. However personal insults will have the same result at both places. Just too much to deal with, and we dont (and them to an much greater degree) have the time to babysit a thread all day. I am sure that most posters understand that, even if sometimes discussions get heated. We understand that as well, and will keep moderation to a minimum (I hope we have to do none, but that will depend on the members)

    I just hope we can keep all of the discussions in this thread (when and if it picks up) and all others civil.

  12. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fallout2600 View Post
    I agree.

    msmith, what say this thread gets moved to the Technology forum? We don't need the whole "Charlie doesn't care about his customers" crap getting started in here....
    You guys moved the thread already? Technology The home for PC's, Video Games, and anything technology related.

    WOW!! And someone accused *ME* of "fanboyism"!

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    7,149
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ergan's Toupe View Post
    You guys moved the thread already? Technology The home for PC's, Video Games, and anything technology related.

    WOW!! And someone accused *ME* of "fanboyism"!
    I can see how it can go in either place. The discussion will be the same in either, and I left a redirect link in the other part of the forum.

    So, 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. No big deal

  14. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by msmith198025 View Post
    They simply wanted to keep the political talk and personal insults out of it. I agree with their decision.

    We do not mind the politics of it, the main reason we are here. However personal insults will have the same result at both places. Just too much to deal with, and we dont (and them to an much greater degree) have the time to babysit a thread all day. I am sure that most posters understand that, even if sometimes discussions get heated. We understand that as well, and will keep moderation to a minimum (I hope we have to do none, but that will depend on the members)
    I agree there is no reason for personal attacks. My point is someone has had a documented history of making stuff up and passing it off as fact. Said person got caught in a blatent lie, but instead of punishing the liar, the whole thread got shut down.

    I don't know, maybe it's me, but it just seems so grammar school. :)

    But that's exactly what happens when you ban everyone with a differing view. That is why discussions get heated, IMO.

    Quote Originally Posted by msmith198025 View Post
    I just hope we can keep all of the discussions in this thread (when and if it picks up) and all others civil.
    Let's hope we can discuss this and leave the "fanboyism" out of it.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    7,149
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Fair enough.

    Now lets get back on topic;)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts