PDA

View Full Version : GOP Cross-Overs Have Earmarks to Gain in $410 Billion Spending Bill



Madtown HD Junkie
March 10th, 2009, 04:06 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/10/gop-cross-overs-earmarks-gain-billion-spending/

Senate Democrats are expected to win over just enough Republicans to move forward on a controversial $410 billion spending bill by the end of the night Tuesday.

But it may come as no surprise that almost all of the Republican senators who are expected to support the bill or are considering supporting it have billions of dollars worth of earmarks in the package.

The earmark-mania is not unique to either party -- both Democrats and Republicans contributed to what Taxpayers for Common Sense estimates is 8,570 disclosed earmarks worth $7.7 billion in the bill that would fund the government through the end of the fiscal year.

But the Republican crossovers in particular have a lot at stake in the package. Two of the three Republicans on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's "definite" list have authored 129 total earmarks worth $190 million, according to an updated list from Taxpayers for Common Sense.

Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., is actually the second-biggest earmarker, according to the list, with 64 earmarks worth $114 million. Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., is a few notches down, with 65 earmarks worth $76 million.

Both are expected to support the omnibus bill -- along with Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe, who has zero earmarks.

They would help Reid get the 60 votes needed to shut off debate on the bill and move it toward final passage. A number of other Republicans are considered possible supporters, and all of them have earmarks to gain.

Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., for instance, has $86 million in earmarks; Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, has $74 million; and Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., has $25 million. Shelby told FOX News Monday that he's vetted all his earmarks.

"I wouldn't want to be associated with an earmark on an appropriation that didn't have a lot of merit to it," he said, adding that the system has been abused by some lawmakers. "What we need to do is vet it more and more. I wouldn't want to give up our right to appropriate money," he said. "Otherwise, we cede it to the president, whoever that is. ... But on the other hand, any earmark you have, it ought to have merit, or we shouldn't do it."

Shelby's earmarks span the gamut, from $800,000 for oyster rehabilitation at the University of South Alabama, to $380,000 to the city of Tarrant, Ala., for streetscaping and walkways.

The top earmarker, by value, is a Democrat -- Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, with $123 million worth of earmarks. The senator with the most earmarks, regardless of their value, is Specter with 134.

Other Republicans, like Sen. John McCain, have tried unsuccessfully to strip the earmarks from the bill. But Democratic Sens. Evan Bayh of Indiana and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin also broke off from their party out of opposition to spending measures like the earmarks.

"It looks as if Congress is just on autopilot, immune to the problems" of Americans, Bayh told a Sunday talk show.

Anytime Snowe wants to switch to the Dems she is free too. She is a disgrace to the GOP. AS for the other GOP sell outs, they should not be re-elected.
All "politicians" should be booted for this earmark BS.

dantheman77
March 10th, 2009, 05:36 PM
typical R's. spending us into a depression

vurbano
March 10th, 2009, 08:06 PM
typical R's. spending us into a depression


Read much?


The earmark-mania is not unique to either party -- both Democrats and Republicans contributed to what Taxpayers for Common Sense estimates is 8,570 disclosed earmarks worth $7.7 billion in the bill that would fund the government through the end of the fiscal year.


The top earmarker, by value, is a Democrat -- Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, with $123 million worth of earmarks. The senator with the most earmarks, regardless of their value, is Specter with 134.

Other Republicans, like Sen. John McCain, have tried unsuccessfully to strip the earmarks from the bill.

msmith198025
March 11th, 2009, 09:58 AM
It is both sides doing it. I am just mad that two of the top earmarkers are from right in my back yard.

fallout2600
March 11th, 2009, 10:12 AM
The earmarks make up less than 5% of the actual spending. In that respect, the earmarks are not the problem. What is the other 95% that we are letting the govt get away with?

cybok0
March 11th, 2009, 11:34 AM
The earmarks make up less than 5% of the actual spending. In that respect, the earmarks are not the problem. What is the other 95% that we are letting the govt get away with?

Even 5% is too much.

vurbano
March 11th, 2009, 11:42 AM
The point is Obama said there would be none under his rule. Yet he makes excuses and will sign it. He siad there was no pork in the bailout bill and it was loaded. The man is a LIAR.

msmith198025
March 11th, 2009, 11:58 AM
Even 5% is too much.

Agreed

fallout2600
March 11th, 2009, 12:53 PM
Shouldn't we be just a little concerned with where the other 95% goes???? If it isn't earmarked, its completely up to the president on what to do with it!!! That's why any president is against earmarks!!!!!!!!! The public has been fooled on the whole earmark debate.