PDA

View Full Version : Hacked: Sensitive Documents Lifted from Hadley Climate Center



froggigger
November 20th, 2009, 07:46 PM
Can't wait to see where this leads!

http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2009/11/20/hacked-sensitive-documents-lifted-from-hadley-climate-center/

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/20/cru_climate_hack/

msmith198025
November 20th, 2009, 08:28 PM
I cant either

Derwin0
November 21st, 2009, 06:18 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,576009,00.html?test=faces

Hackers broke into the servers at a prominent British climate research center and leaked years worth of e-mail messages onto the Web, including one with a mysterious reference to a plan to "hide the decline," apparently in temperatures.
...
In an exclusive interview in Investigate magazine's TGIF Edition, Phil Jones, the head of the Hadley CRU, confirmed that the leaked data is real.

msmith198025
November 21st, 2009, 06:34 AM
Merged these two

Derwin0
November 21st, 2009, 07:05 AM
Merged these two
thanks :thumbup:
I must have missed the other one, a sure sign I need more coffee. :D

fallout2600
November 21st, 2009, 07:56 AM
This is great! They can blame this on hackers, but I work in IT and I can tell you that 99.9% of the time, the hack is performed by an inside employee that is pissed off about something. Hopefully this puts a halt to the Enviro-Fascist movement.


If anyone wants the files, here they are:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=75J4XO4T

froggigger
November 21st, 2009, 08:31 PM
They'll make the story about the hacking and minimize any incriminating evidence.

fallout2600
November 22nd, 2009, 09:24 AM
They'll make the story about the hacking and minimize any incriminating evidence.

Yep. Hackers have ALWAYS been political targets!

froggigger
November 22nd, 2009, 04:37 PM
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_V9Jagb528cY/Ssa0hGHvqzI/AAAAAAAAC9E/B_NgGqh5zag/s400/0000000000_tombstone.jpg

msmith198025
November 23rd, 2009, 05:56 AM
No libs to weigh in on this?

Bob Haller
November 23rd, 2009, 07:26 AM
ahh, the study of global warming is WORLD WIDE.

so your saying theres a world wide conspiracy to make up and hide data?

heres my tin foil hat, you really need it

Bear Paws
November 23rd, 2009, 05:39 PM
I came across this yesterday and down loaded 15 min of down load Then I couldn't unzip it. My winzip was out of date and I didn't want to resubscribe.
Today the New York Times refused to print any of it becaues "they don't print anything that was not meant to be seen" Like the Pentagon Paper and a few CIA and military secrets

froggigger
November 23rd, 2009, 07:36 PM
I came across this yesterday and down loaded 15 min of down load Then I couldn't unzip it. My winzip was out of date and I didn't want to resubscribe.
Today the New York Times refused to print any of it becaues "they don't print anything that was not meant to be seen" Like the Pentagon Paper and a few CIA and military secrets

It's around 160M unzipped. Here's a sample. See the part I bolded. Interesting.

From: Keith Briffa <k.briffa@uea.ac.uk>
To: mann@psu.edu
Subject: Re: quick note on TAR
Date: Sun Apr 29 19:53:16 2007

Mike
your words are a real boost to me at the moment. I found myself questioning the whole
process and being often frustrated at the formulaic way things had to be done - often
wasting time and going down dead ends. I really thank you for taking the time to say these
kind words . I tried hard to balance the needs of the science and the IPCC , which were not
always the same. I worried that you might think I gave the impression of not supporting you
well enough while trying to report on the issues and uncertainties . Much had to be removed
and I was particularly unhappy that I could not get the statement into the SPM regarding
the AR4 reinforcement of the results and conclusions of the TAR. I tried my best but we
were basically railroaded by Susan. I am happy to pass the mantle on to someone else next
time. I feel I have basically produced nothing original or substantive of my own since this
whole process started. I am at this moment , having to work on the ENV submission to the
forthcoming UK Research Assessment exercise , again instead of actually doing some useful
research ! Anyway thanks again Mike.... really appreciated when it comes from you
very best wishes
Keith

froggigger
November 23rd, 2009, 07:43 PM
Couple more tidbits:

"I know there is pressure to present a nice tidy story as regards 'apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand years or more in the proxy data' but in reality the situation is not quite so simple. We don't have a lot of proxies that come right up to date and those that do (at least a significant number of tree proxies ) some unexpected changes in response that do not match the recent warming."


"Another serious issue to be considered relates to the fact that the PC1 time series in the Mann et al. analysis was adjusted to reduce the positive slope in the last 150 years (on the assumption - following an earlier paper by Lamarche et al. - that this incressing growth was evidence of carbon dioxide fertilization) , by differencing the data from another record produced by other workers in northern Alaska and Canada (which incidentally was standardised in a totally different way). This last adjustment obviously will have a large influence on the quantification of the link between these Western US trees and N.Hemisphere temperatures. At this point, it is fair to say that this adjustment was arbitrary and the link between Bristlecone pine growth and CO2 is , at the very least, arguable."

msmith198025
November 23rd, 2009, 08:12 PM
yeah, Beck showed that too. Didnt see it on other networks.....

Really, this is not as cut and dried as some would have you believe.

Bear Paws
November 23rd, 2009, 09:07 PM
yeah, Beck showed that too. Didnt see it on other networks.....

Really, this is not as cut and dried as some would have you believe.What is not as cut and dry? The Global Warming hoax or the discovery or rather the exposing of the evidence of the conspiracy of several researchers creating the hoax for grant moneys.

fallout2600
November 24th, 2009, 09:17 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydo2Mwnwpac

msmith198025
November 24th, 2009, 10:16 AM
What is not as cut and dry? The Global Warming hoax or the discovery or rather the exposing of the evidence of the conspiracy of several researchers creating the hoax for grant moneys.

Global warming in general. The people that want to push this as a matter of policy would have you believe that the science is absolute and undisputed. It isnt

fallout2600
November 24th, 2009, 10:57 AM
Global Warming, true.
Global Cooling, true.

Man-made Global Warming, only true thru man-made manipulated computer models and software. That's what the "hackers" exposed.