US court protecting NAZI war criminal

[vurbano]

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2009-04-14-demjanjuk-appeal_N.htm?csp=34

[Bob Haller]

verb you need to get a life............

israel had the fellow in custody and released him some 20 years ago.

the guy is almost 90 and cant walk, they carried him out in a wheelchair.

at this point germany should be embarased by attempting proscuetion.

stupidity at its worst

[Nooblet the LEET]

For a man in that condition is a trial necessary? He already has a foot in the grave it seems.

[vurbano]

For a man in that condition is a trial necessary? He already has a foot in the grave it seems.no but an execution is. Charles Manson is old should we let him go free? Yes he has a foot in the grave and has never spent one day paying for his crimes.

[vurbano]

verb you need to get a life............

israel had the fellow in custody and released him some 20 years ago.

the guy is almost 90 and cant walk, they carried him out in a wheelchair.

at this point germany should be embarased by attempting proscuetion.

stupidity at its worst

he was arrested in Isreal under mistaken identity of being a different war criminal.


Demjanjuk had been tried in Israel after accusations surfaced that he was the notorious Nazi guard "Ivan the Terrible" in Poland at the Treblinka death camp. He was found guilty in 1988 of war crimes and crimes against humanity, a conviction later overturned by the Israeli Supreme Court.
How does that protect him from prosecution for what he did?


"His work at the Sobibor death camp was to push men, women and children into the gas chamber. He had no mercy, no pity and no remorse for the families whose lives he was destroying forever," Hier said.
Are you telling me that if I commit crime A and am arrested for crime B that I didnt do and let go that that frees me from prosecution for Crime A?

Your position is stupidity at its worse.

[Derwin0]

he was arrested in Isreal under mistaken identity of being a different war criminal. Unfortunately that makes me wonder if they have the right identity this time. A defense attorney should have a field day with that.

If he is what they say he is, I agree he should pay. But the past history makes me suspicious.

[msmith198025]

How does that protect him from prosecution for what he did?




It shouldnt. IF he is who they say he is, and if they give him a fair trial, he should have to pay for his crimes, no matter how old or what condition he is in now.

[Carl]

verb you need to get a life............

israel had the fellow in custody and released him some 20 years ago.

the guy is almost 90 and cant walk, they carried him out in a wheelchair.

at this point germany should be embarased by attempting proscuetion.

stupidity at its worst

agreed. the man will probably die tomorrow.

[Bob Haller]

yeah the time to do this was a generation ago not when the guy is at deaths door already.

like i said germany should be ashamed of what its attempting to do

[msmith198025]

yeah the time to do this was a generation ago not when the guy is at deaths door already.

like i said germany should be ashamed of what its attempting to do

Yes, it should have been done then. It wasnt. So now what? Forget about it and he does not pay the penalty for his crimes (if in fact he is guilty?)

Justice should be blind, unless you are old? Seriously?

[vurbano]

agreed. the man will probably die tomorrow.
Then get a rope around his neck quick.

[vurbano]

Yes, it should have been done then. It wasnt. So now what? Forget about it and he does not pay the penalty for his crimes (if in fact he is guilty?)

Justice should be blind, unless you are old? Seriously?Yeah If you get away with it long enough you should get a Mulligan. :free-happy-smileys-

[fallout2600]

That was funny :free-happy-smileys-

[msmith198025]

yeah if you get away with it long enough you should get a mulligan. :free-happy-smileys-

lol

[Nooblet the LEET]

no but an execution is. Charles Manson is old should we let him go free? Yes he has a foot in the grave and has never spent one day paying for his crimes.
Manson wasn't already tried and then released for the same alleged crimes beforehand.

From the article posted.

Demjanjuk had been tried in Israel after accusations surfaced that he was the notorious Nazi guard "Ivan the Terrible" in Poland at the Treblinka death camp. He was found guilty in 1988 of war crimes and crimes against humanity, a conviction later overturned by the Israeli Supreme Court.
What it all boils down to is your sense of justice. Can we really get any justice out of a man at the end of his life?


Yeah If you get away with it long enough you should get a Mulligan. :free-happy-smileys-
I think thats called the statute of limitations, though I like the sound of mulligan.

[vurbano]

Manson wasn't already tried and then released for the same alleged crimes beforehand.

neither was this guy. The first trial was for someone that he was not and in a different prison camp. One really has to wonder about your sense of justice and though processes. I suppose we should let all murders out of jail who were first found innocent of a previous murder in their lives. They couldnt possibly be guilty of a different one. I swear mad needs to start issuing an IQ test before granting access to people in this place.

[vurbano]

What the government needs to do is to book this guy on a cruise ship and issue boarding passes to a group of Mossad agents.

[Madtown HD Junkie]

What the government needs to do is to book this guy on a cruise ship and issue boarding passes to a group of Mossad agents.

:free-happy-smileys-:free-happy-smileys-:free-happy-smileys-:free-happy-smileys-:thumbup:

[Derwin0]

neither was this guy. The first trial was for someone that he was not and in a different prison camp.
Which is what concerns me. If they didn't have the right guy the first time, why should we think they have the right guy now?

[msmith198025]

Which is what concerns me. If they didn't have the right guy the first time, why should we think they have the right guy now?

Well that is a possiblility in every trial. I do not think that should keep the trial from happening. If it turns out he is not the right person, let him go, just like they do in any case (here anyway. I am assuming that Germany would do the same)

[vurbano]

Which is what concerns me. If they didn't have the right guy the first time, why should we think they have the right guy now?
Evidence probably. I am not sure how you can piss on their case without knowing any of it. I am certainly not going too. There is no reason to believe that justice will not be served as it was the last time. What would be criminal would be to stand in the way of it. Just because someone is put on trial does not mean they are guilty.